When I first came across ratios for Amber Technology, I only understood profitability, efficiency, liquidity and market ratios. I thought they were straightforward.
Profitability ratios – Does the firm have the ability to earn a profit relative to its sales revenue, operating expenses, balance sheet assets and shareholders’ equity? Well, by looking at the ratios, for Amber Technology the general answer would be no. The firm’s PM and RNOA decreased from 0.4% (2016) to -2.3% (2019) and 1.0% (2016) to -4.7% (2019) respectively. This means the firm’s cost of production exceeds its total sales, which represents its inability to control expenses.
Efficiency ratios – How well can the firm use its assets to generate income? Generally, I will say the firm has the ability to use the resources efficiently. Its total ATO has ranged between 225% – 196.5% for the past four years. However, at the same time the firm’s current ATO has been low. It has remained between 2.2% – 2.5%. By looking at this, it is obvious that the firm has been turning its current asserts in the form of sales less number of times, which represents the incapability of the firm to achieve maximum sales with the minimum investment in current assets.
Liquidity ratio – Will its current assets be sufficient to meet the company’s obligations when they are due? The general answer to this will be yes. For the past four years the firm’s current ratio has ranged from 1.3 -1.7. This means that the firm had 1.3-1.7 times more current assets compared to liabilities to cover its debt. However, its quick ratios 1& 2 ranged between 0.7 – 0.6 and 0.1 – 0.1 respectively. This means that the firm may not be able to completely pay off its liabilities in the short term.
Market ratios – Are firm’s shares over-priced or under-priced? It is earning how much it is supposed to earn should from those shares? The general answer to this will be no. Most the firm’s market ratios have equaled zero for the past four years and higher market/book ratio represented that shares/stock was expensive. Evaluating all these ratios got me wondering. What might have happened in the past four years to cause these changes to these ratios?
Well, if you look properly at the discussion above, you will see that I did not discuss two of my firm’s ratios – the financial structure ratios and ratios based on formulated financial statements. I felt like I did not have much idea about them. Therefore, I decided to try to understand them. Here is what I found. Debt/equity ratio – this shows a relative proportion of shareholders equity and debt used to finance firm’s assets. In my firm’s case, its debt/equity ratios are higher (222.4% – 163.2%) which means that the firm has more debts than assets. I may be wrong to say that but digging deeper into the financial statements, its borrowings increased in 2019 (by $882,000), in 2018 (by $333,000) and in 2017 by $859,000.
Please comment and tell me what you think! Ratios based on formulated financial statements – I think these are the ratios I calculated based on the restated financial statements? What are they all about and what do they tell us?